LegalSifter uses AI to analyze contracts and legal documents, helping businesses identify key clauses, risks, and compliance issues for better decision-making.
LegalSifter is an AI-powered contract review and redlining platform that streamlines legal document analysis by automatically identifying risks, suggesting edits, and applying attorney-quality redlines directly within Microsoft Word, reducing review times by up to 90%.[1][2] The platform combines contract-specific AI developed and refined over 10 years with attorney-curated playbooks for common agreement types including NDAs, Service Agreements, and SaaS Agreements, enabling organizations to standardize negotiations and enforce consistent legal positions across their teams.[1][4]
LegalSifter serves legal departments, procurement teams, business operations, and non-legal professionals who need to manage high volumes of contracts efficiently, empowering them to perform accurate first-pass reviews without extensive legal training.[3][4] What distinguishes LegalSifter from generic AI tools is its rules-based approach grounded in real-world lawyering practices—rather than offering generic suggestions, it provides explainable, defensible recommendations aligned to your organization's preferred language and risk tolerance, with the ability to customize playbooks over time.[4]
The platform supports multiple file formats including DOCX, DOC, and PDF, integrates with Google Docs and Microsoft Word, and offers additional capabilities such as contract lifecycle management, data extraction, and managed services support for organizations lacking dedicated AI administration resources.[5][6]
Sources
The ToS does not explicitly address whether user data or documents submitted to LegalSifter are used to train AI models.
No training opt-out mechanism was identified in the legal documents.
High risk across multiple dimensions. Only use with public, non-sensitive data.
The ToS does not explicitly address whether user data or documents submitted to LegalSifter are used to train AI models. The absence of clear language either prohibiting or permitting AI training on user content creates moderate concern, as the vendor retains broad rights over content and could claim service improvement justifications.
“[ToS] Not found in documents - no explicit statement on AI training use of user data”
The ToS grants LegalSifter broad, perpetual rights over user content. Section 3 states LegalSifter retains 'all worldwide rights' and prohibits copying or use 'without prior written consent,' implying LegalSifter claims ownership or broad licensing rights over submitted materials. This is unfavorable for enterprises seeking to retain IP control.
“[ToS] 'LegalSifter shall retain all worldwide rights in the intellectual property of the Site and any content on the Site' and 'nothing...may be copied, reproduced, modified, distributed...without prior written consent of LegalSifter'”
The ToS does not explicitly detail third-party sharing practices or sub-processor arrangements. Section 7 mentions LegalSifter is not responsible for linked external sites, but there is no clear statement about whether user data is shared with partners, affiliates, or service providers, creating moderate uncertainty.
“[ToS] Not found in documents - no explicit third-party sharing policy provided”
The ToS does not specify data retention periods, deletion timelines, or account termination cleanup procedures. The absence of clear retention and deletion policies creates moderate concern about how long company data remains accessible or stored.
“[ToS] Not found in documents - no data retention or deletion policy stated”
Section 3 and 4 of the ToS indicate LegalSifter retains ownership of all intellectual property and content on the Site. While the ToS does not explicitly claim ownership of user-generated outputs, the broad language asserting LegalSifter's 'worldwide rights' and prohibition on use without consent suggests the vendor claims significant rights over submitted content.
“[ToS] 'LegalSifter shall retain all worldwide rights in the intellectual property of the Site and any content on the Site' and 'As between the parties, LegalSifter solely shall own and hereby retains all rights, title and interest'”
The ToS contains no mention of SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, or other security certifications. Section 9 mentions 'reasonable security measures' but provides no formal compliance documentation, trust page, or DPA reference, indicating lack of published security standards.
“[ToS] 'We use reasonable security measures and take reasonable system, process and administrative precautions to protect the security and integrity of email and other electronic communications' - no certifications mentioned”
Track and measure your AI tools with Olakai's observability platform.
Explore Olakai