Crosby AI is an advanced tool that leverages artificial intelligence to streamline communication and enhance collaboration within teams, improving productivity and project management.
Crosby AI is an agentic AI-powered law firm that revolutionizes contract review and negotiation by combining proprietary AI agents with in-house lawyers to deliver marked-up contracts in under an hour, transforming legal bottlenecks into accelerators for business growth.[1][2][4] Its core value proposition lies in providing fast, affordable, and predictable legal services through fixed-fee per-document pricing, eliminating hourly billing and enabling sales teams to close deals without delays.[3][7]
Key features include seamless integration via Slack or email for inbound contract ingestion, AI-driven initial analysis with suggested redlines and flagged risks, human lawyer oversight for complex judgments, and emerging capabilities like predictive counterparty negotiation insights from anonymized data pools.[2][7] Designed for high-growth startups and scaling companies like Cursor, Clay, and Unify—particularly those handling high volumes of MSAs, NDAs, and DPAs without in-house counsel—Crosby excels in revenue contract workflows for GTM teams racing to sign enterprise customers.[1][4][5]
What sets it apart is its hybrid model of lawyers and engineers creating real-time feedback loops for continuous AI improvement, building data moats from contract clauses, and operating as a full law firm rather than mere software, backed by investors like Sequoia and Bain Capital Ventures.[1][3][8]
Sources
The document does not explicitly state whether user data is used to train AI models. Language about 'service improvement
The document does not explicitly state whether user data is used to train AI models. Language about 'service improvement
Moderate risk. Suitable for internal data but avoid confidential information.
The document does not explicitly state whether user data is used to train AI models. Language about 'service improvement' and 'enhance' features is vague, and there is no clear opt-out mechanism or statement prohibiting training on user content.
“[ToS] 'To understand and analyse the usage trends, interests, and preferences of our users, to improve the way the Website and Services works and looks, and to create new features and functionality.'”
The document does not explicitly define the scope of license granted by users over their content. Language about sharing with 'service providers and partners' and processing for stated purposes is present but lacks clarity on sublicensing restrictions or license termination terms.
“[ToS] 'to our group companies, third party services providers and partners who provide data processing services to us (for example, to support the delivery of, provide functionality on, or help to enhance the security and features of our Website and Services)'”
The document indicates sharing with 'group companies, third party services providers and partners' and mentions Standard Contractual Clauses for EEA transfers, but does not provide a published sub-processor list or detailed restrictions on what partners can do with the data.
“[ToS] 'to our group companies, third party services providers and partners who provide data processing services to us... or who otherwise process personal information for purposes that are described in this Privacy Notice'”
The document states retention occurs 'where we have an ongoing legitimate business need' and mentions deletion or anonymization when no longer needed, but does not specify concrete retention periods or timelines for deletion upon request.
“[ToS] 'We retain personal information we collect from you where we have an ongoing legitimate business need to do so... we will either delete or anonymize it or... securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.'”
The document does not explicitly address ownership of outputs generated by the service. The absence of clear language about user ownership of generated content or vendor claims to outputs creates ambiguity.
“Not found in documents”
The document mentions Standard Contractual Clauses for EEA transfers and references to data protection laws, but does not explicitly state SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR compliance certification, HIPAA, or other formal security certifications.
“[ToS] 'we have taken appropriate safeguards to require that your personal information will remain protected in accordance with this Privacy Notice and applicable laws. If you are from the EEA or the UK, these include implementing the European Commission's Standard Contractual Clauses'”
Track and measure your AI tools with Olakai's observability platform.
Explore Olakai